IA agrees in regard to EU landing obligation, that Fishery’s clients comment is appropriate to…”place importance on the legal obligations of their respective national management authorities in respect of the landing obligation. I agree. The condition must be seen in this context.” and therefore accepts CAB’s reformulated proposal for the condition and not prescribing how to review method of compliance with the regulation, while objectors had argued that “evidence is provided of Landing Obligation compliance”. ….”this should be by bodies other than the Fisheries and in that way there would be greater independence and integrity about the process.”
